Ethereum's Roadmap: PECTRA, Fusaka, and the Scalability Hunt Without Security Breaches

What’s next for Ethereum? Here's how upgrades like Pectra and Fusaka aim to boost scalability without compromising security.

Ethereum's Roadmap: PECTRA, Fusaka, and the Scalability Hunt
Ethereum's Roadmap: PECTRA, Fusaka, and the Scalability Hunt

💡
This guest post was written by Oluwatosin Sangoyoyiwa.

The most recent upgrades of Ethereum after the Merge come in the form of PECTRA, Fusaka, and potentially a future phrase tentatively dubbed “Glamster Dam”. The upgrades entirely aim at scalability while making sure that tight security does not get lost along the way.

But really, what do the upgrades do? Why does Ethereum go slower compared to other blockchains? And how do these changes in turn affect users, stakers, and Layer 2 (L2) networks?

Ethereum implements changes with a security-first emphasis, putting scaling into second place.

Unlike blockchains that rush rapid upgrades that are untested, Ethereum goes about things slowly, testing the impact of changes in ACD (All Core Devs) calls where they are debated before they become bundled into hard forks or major network upgrades. 

Why Security Is Non-Negotiable

Ethereum's economy worth more than $400B (as of early 2025) must be resilient to withstand attacks. Transactions cannot be reversed by Ethereum like banks do. Once an error is made on Ethereum, it is permanent on its blockchain.

The DAO Hack (2016): The notorious hack drained $60 million of Ether and led to Ethereum's very first and only much debated-hard fork to recover those funds.

Given Ethereum's scale and decentralized governance today, such an intervention might be logistically and politically impossible.

Ethereum has never experienced downtime since its launch in 2015, unlike other blockchains such as Solana which has experienced multiple outages.

This security-first mindset means upgrades take 6-12 months or longer (as opposed to the far quicker chains of Solana or Avalanche) and are well worth the trade-off: Ethereum remains the most trusted smart contract platform.

PECTRA: The Next Big Upgrade (Q1 2025)

PECTRA slated for early 2025 includes two upgrades: Execution Layer (Prague) which enhances smart contract functionality and Consensus Layer (Elektra) improves validator efficiency.

The first key change is MaxEB (EIP-7251), a staking revolution. At the moment, every validator must stake 32 ETH and not a single penny more. That means that a person with 320 ETH can run as many as 10 separate validators, thus clogging up the entire system. EIP-7251 raises the max effective balance per validator to 2,048 ETH.

Big Stakers like Coinbase, Lido, Kraken can consolidate stakes into fewer validators, reducing network overhead. Small stakers (32 to 2048 ETH) will auto compound their holdings without splitting their stake.

Why does all of this matter? There is reduced bandwidth waste, which opens up more scaling options (such as additional data for Layer 2s) and more equitable incentives for single stakeholder.

Moving on, the second key change is 50% more Blobs (EIP-7594), which means lower layer 2 fees. Ethereum's "blobs," which are data bundles introduced in Dencun upgrade (March 2024) for Layer 2s like Arbitrum and Optimism, will get a 50% increase. There were 3 blobs per block Pre-PECTRA, but Post-PECTRA, there will be 6 blobs per block. 

What is the impact? More blobs means lower L2 transaction fees, and higher throughput. Prior to PECTRA, L2 fees hover around $0.05-$0.20, after PECTRA, they could drop further.

Fusaka: The 48-Blob Experiment (Mid-to-Late 2025)

Following PECTRA, Fusaka aims to push scalability further by testing a 48-blob capacity—an 8x increase from today’s 6 blobs post-PECTRA (and 16x from Dencun’s 3). Why 48 Blobs? L2 networks (such as Arbitrum, Base, and Optimism) have recently begun doing an amazing 3 - 5X more transactions than the Ethereum mainnet.

Therefore, more blobs mean lower fees. Vitalik Buterin has suggested that 16 blobs could drive L2 fees below $0.01. At 48 blobs, fees could approach near-zero levels. L2s might manage even more transactions with increased throughput, competing with centralized payment systems.

However, the current challenges include bandwidth constraints, which means Ethereum peer-to-peer network must handle the increased data load. Also, testing is really important. To avoid hazards, Fusaka will first operate as a testnet.

Why Ethereum Upgrades Take So Long

Security Over Speed: Proposals such as EIP-7702 to enhance Account Abstraction have been debated since 2017, reflecting on the careful evaluation process that Ethereum is known for. The Merge itself was delayed for years in a bid to ensure a smooth transition from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake that came into effect in September 2022.

Decentralized Decision Making: In contrast to Solana, which has a single team governing the platform, Ethereum relies on several independent client teams (Geth, Nethermind, Lighthouse, etc.), creating consensus before any upgrades take place.

Lingering Questions & Risks

Will MaxEB centralize staking? Critics fear MaxEB could favor large staking pools like Lido, which controls 30% of validators.

However, this design is geared towards efficiency rather than exclusion; thus, even solo stakers automatically compound their rewards, somewhat normalizing the situation. The issue of centralization lingers in the shadows, but it is not new to Ethereum.

Can Ethereum deal with 48 Blobs? Yes, but over time-the six blobs upgrade from PECTRA is definitely a step toward 48. Fusaka's testnet will enable the fine-tuning of performances. Bandwidth upgrades and peer-to-peer optimizations are already in progress.

What’s with the weird upgrade names? Post-Merge, Ethereum blends naming conventions from both layers. The Execution Layer uses Devcon city names like Prague and Osaka, while the Consensus Layer draws from star names such as Elektra and Fulu. 

Combining these yields PECTRA (Prague + Elektra) and Fusaka (Fulu + Osaka).

Glamster Dam is speculative, possibly Gamma, (a star prefix) + Amsterdam, but nobody has confirmed yet.

Ethereum has a series of upgrades in its roadmap. The PECTRA hard fork (Prague + Electra) is scheduled for Q1 2025 as previously speculated; it will combine enhancements on the execution layer (Prague) with the consensus layer (Elektra). 

Following this, the Fusaka testnet (Fulu + Osaka) will launch in mid- to late 2025 to test future enhancements including a large increase in data capacity. 

Beyond 2026, future plans may include "Glamster Dam" (likely Gamma + Amsterdam) for further scaling again, focusing on sharding or statelessness (e.g. Verkle trees). These sequential upgrades exemplify Ethereum's prudent and incremental approach to development.

Steady Steps, Lasting Impact

Ethereum's upgrades are not flashy, but they're built to last. While other chains run to hype venues, Ethereum focuses on security, decentralization, and sustainable scaling.

PECTRA’s cheaper L2 fees (via blobs) and staking efficiency (via MaxEB) pave the way for Fusaka’s ambitious scalability push.

Would you rather have fast, risky upgrades, or slow steady progress? Ethereum has made its choice; and it is paying off.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Obiex. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research before making any financial decisions. Obiex is not responsible for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.